Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 81e75f84 authored by Hurak's avatar Hurak
Browse files

Added some comment on the data to the data README.

parent fd397575
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
......@@ -15,6 +15,17 @@ Two new data structs then appear in the workspace
- `simulated_pos_ol_response`
- `measured_acc_ol_response`
The first two data structures contain (vertical) positions of the three levels/stages:
- `zr` for the road level,
- `zus` for the suspension level,
- `zs` for the car level.
Strictly speaking, just `zr` and `zs` are measured by their dedicated sensors. The absolute position `zus`
is inferred as a difference between `zs` and yet another encoder measurement `zs-zus`.
The third data structs contain just the acceleration of the car level, that is, `d2/dt2 zs`.
Plot these using
```matlab
......@@ -46,4 +57,4 @@ You will get something like the figures below
![figures/simulated_pos_ol_response.png](figures/simulated_pos_ol_response.png)
![figures/measured_acc_ol_response.png](figures/measured_acc_ol_response.png)
See the corresponding Simulink file for the meaning of the stored variables.
\ No newline at end of file
Apparently, the simulation responses do not quite fit the experimental ones. Some optimization-based fitting might be needed here.
\ No newline at end of file
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment